Merriann Panarella - Dispute Resolution Services

Arbitrator | Mediator | Consultant

  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Training/Conferences
  • Affiliations
  • Blog
  • Contact

Archives for January 2015

A Pitch for Patent Mediation

January 14, 2015 by Merriann Panarella

Mediation has been center stage in dispute resolution processes; it affords parties and their counsel many well known advantages: privacy, informality, an opportunity for a frank evaluation of the merits, and control including the ability to manage the costs and risks of litigation as well as the outcome. All these factors become even more pronounced when the dispute in question involves patents.

First and foremost, are the costs associated with patent litigation. Patent cases take an average of 2.5 years to resolve, according to PWC’s 2014 Patent Litigation Study, taking valuable time away from ‘business as usual’. And it is expensive: according to the AIPLA Report of the Economic Survey 2013, when $1-10 million is at stake, the median litigation costs through discovery amount to $1 million and total costs to $2 million. If $10-25 million is at stake, these figures jump to $2 million and $3.325 million respectively, and for matters with over $25 million at stake, the figures are $3 million and $5.5 million. Moreover, parties often head to larger law firms when their IP is at risk, ratcheting up each of these figures. For example, if over $25 million is at stake and the firm hired has over 60 employees, the litigation costs increase to $4.7 million through discovery and $7 million in total. [Read more…]

Filed Under: IP Mediation, Mediation

Second Circuit Finds Goldman Can’t Compel Arbitration in an NCUA Case

January 5, 2015 by Merriann Panarella

Despite several creative arguments and “artful Monday-morning quarterbacking”, Goldman Sachs can not compel the National Credit Union Administrative Board (“NCUA”) to arbitrate a dispute over a failed credit union’s purchase of residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”).

In National Credit Union Administration Board v. Goldman Sachs & Co., No. 14-312-cv (2nd Cir. Dec. 23, 2014), NCUA sued Goldman in September 2013 alleging violations of federal and state securities laws in the offering and sale of the RMBS. NCUA is a federal agency which regulates federal credit unions and has the power to place a financially precarious credit union under conservatorship or liquidation. As liquidating agent, NCUA has the right to bring suit on behalf of the credit union. In 2010, NCUA placed Southwest Corporate Federal Credit Union (“Southwest”) into conservatorship and then involuntary liquidation after Southwest suffered substantial losses as a result of purchasing triple A-rated RMBS from Goldman which were later downgraded to below investment grade. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Arbitration
©2018 MPanarella    Merriann Panarella | mpanarella@panarellaADR.com |    Web Design by  Anne Pouch Web Design

Return to top of page